Suggestions for Improvement

Could ITS scan for missing documents? I caught a couple that I accidentally moved to trash and since Google will display files in trash for up to a month applicants may not realize the file is no longer there (although it says in small print on top of the page “file in trash”).
Should we only flag errors if the hyperlink is to a native google document?
- addresses the anonymity concern but not the access concern where reviewers might not have access to the files outside the shared drive
Scan hits caused by contract renewal applicants re-using their appendices document with hyperlinks to files in their prior year's contract renewal shared drive
Reword messaging in the link scanning report
- app will still be submitted
- you only have to move/copy the bulleted files
- the numbered files are already in your shared drive
- we scanned all files on your dossier
Only scan files on the dossier
- i'm biased/brainwashed because our original concept was the the dossier tab would be the only files
- advantages
  - scan is quicker
  - easier to understand for the applicants
  - applicants don't have to worry about the files that they don't plan to show to the reviewers
- disadvantages
  - potentially lots of unused files in the shared drive (but it is supposed to be a workspace)
don't allow scanning an hour before the t/p deadline

bring the site down at 4:30pm
- start the auto sub job at 5pm so that the other quartz jobs
reminder feature
- set it up as a job or on startup
- 2 weeks before the auto submit date
- only send to In Progress apps
- 1 mo, 2 weeks, 1 week?
- list issues or reminders like scan hits, exclusions, eligibility review

url to the shared drive
pre-create the sections in the drive and create a starting narrative document
reporting
- how many 2021 applicants didn't link anything to their portal?
- how many sections do applicants have per campus?