Attendees
Kris from UHPA
Agenda
130 challenges received by UHPA so they need data from our system
- it's a third of their case load
set up a role for UHPA
- they need to have read-only access to the eligibility, dossier and reviews tabs only
- trying to get rid of S&W versus making a recommendation
- Kris' solution is if you can't make a decision, you're not qualified to serve
Kris' concern is how reviewing committees are getting together? zoom, online, phone calls, in person
- Manoa is using Laulima for discussion and voting
Deena sets the polls up for the reviewers
- this could become an issue for reviewers that don't want to review online
- under 40 folks would be inclined but maybe not so over 40
Chancellors can meet with the TPRC
- to what extent does there need to be documentation that this meeting took place
- this process needs to capture the timeline of the procedure
- all things must be done on the appropriate timeline
need to capture President's ruling so that we have the complete timeline of events
possibly adding input fields to the Recommendations page for easier reporting because you can't report on things in a gdoc or word doc
- "I agree with the TPRC" or "I don't agree with the TPRC and met with them on xxxx and here's my assessment"
- she doesn't have an issue with the one page rebuttal
stress to the applicant that they need to keep a copy of their dossier in order to rebut
- applicant will have view only access during their rebuttal so Kris is ok with that
What is helping to Kris is give them a list of who will be participating in 2020
- reason is that they start getting calls about it and so it gives UHPA a heads up
Manoa
- gearing to get 20-30 applicants for 2020
CC
- gearing to get 35 applicants for 2020
Contract Renewals
- for CC's, it's the same as the TnP process but without the TPRC review
Action Items
- Cameron Ahana extrapolate the jiras from this meeting