Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

Version 1 Next »

Attendees

Former user (Deleted)

Sandra Uyeno

Deena Yamamoto

Leilani Umehira

Cameron Ahana

Kris from UHPA

Agenda

130 challenges received by UHPA so they need data from our system

  • it's a third of their case load
  • set up a role for UHPA
    • they need to have read-only access to the eligibility, dossier and reviews tabs only
  • trying to get rid of S&W versus making a recommendation
    • Kris' solution is if you can't make a decision, you're not qualified to serve

Kris' concern is how reviewing committees are getting together? zoom, online, phone calls, in person

  • Manoa is using Laulima for discussion and voting
  • (minus) Deena sets the polls up for the reviewers
  • this could become an issue for reviewers that don't want to review online
    • under 40 folks would be inclined but maybe not so over 40
  • (minus) Chancellor's can meet with the TPRC
    • to what extent does there need to be documentation that this meeting took place
    • this process needs to capture the timeline of the procedure
      • all things must be done on the appropriate timeline
  • she doesn't have an issue with the one page rebuttal
    • (warning) stress to the applicant that they need to keep a copy of their dossier in order to rebut
    • but they will have view only access during their rebuttal

What is helping to Kris is give them a list of who will be participating in 2019

  • reason is that they start getting calls about 

Manoa

  • gearing to get 20-30 applicants for 2019

CC

  • gearing to get 35 applicants for 2019


Action Items

  •  
  • No labels