...
Table of Contents
Table of Contents | ||
---|---|---|
|
Responsibilities
The Technical Architecture Committee (TAC) will be responsible for the following activities
...
TAC will be responsible for keeping any deliverables such as standards or lifecycle roadmaps up to date. Reviews will likely occur on rotating basis with each deliverable being periodically reviewed and updated. A regular review process will ensure that the ITS architecture will evolve over time and react in a reasonable pace to changes in the IT and higher education industries.
Membership
TAC shall be made up of the ITS staff that are serving in domain architectural roles. In the past, these roles have been very informal, but through the TAC these roles may will grow more formal over time. The following people serve on the TAC. The list will change over time as we evolve this process.
Domain | Key Resources |
---|---|
App Development | Cameron Ahana, Sid Savara, Michael Hodges |
Cloud Infrastructure | TBD, Michael Hodges |
Data Center | Chris Zane, Kevin Kawabata |
Database | Vernon Yoshida |
DevOps | Cameron Ahana, Steven Sakata, Michael Hodges |
High Performance Computing | Ron Merrill |
Middleware & Identity Mngt | Michael Hodges |
Logging & Instrumentation | TBD |
Monitoring & Incident Mngt | Mitch Ochi |
Network | Chris Zane |
Operating Systems | Steven Sakata |
Windows Infrastructure | Osamu Makiguchi |
Security | Darryl Higa |
Storage | Steven Sakata |
Video | Royd Liu |
The TAC will periodically update the TAC Membership document as needed to keep the list of ITS domains and members current.
Committee Sponsor
The TAC will be overseen by the ITS directors. The directors may designate a director to provide TAC oversight and to serve as or designate the TAC chairDirector of Technology Infrastructure. The TI Director may either serve as the chair the TAC or the director may designate the TAC chair.
Any cross-organizational issues of significance will be escalated to the ITS Directors.
Timeframe and Meeting Schedule
The TAC should meet sufficiently often such that it is relatively easy for new projects to get on the agenda and to be reviewed in a timely manner.
...