| Module | Question | Answer |
|---|
| Do we need to give the applicant access to their team drive and dossier at state 112 and 2nd DPC assessment? | Google Team Drive access levels if the applicant will edit their own dossier/team drive, then give them the contributor role |
Review | If there's a negative review, what's the workflow process like? | After the TPRC does their review, then the Chancellor's office gets the dossier and has to look at all of the recommendations. At this point, they need to notify the applicant: 1) what the TPRC's recommendation is, and 2) if there is any negative at any other level, and if so, they are given 5 days to notify the Chancellor whether they want to review the document. That's when you told me that the email was already sent to the applicant saying that the reviews were done and that they can see their dossier--which we need to fix because they shouldn't automatically have access to their document at this point in time. Applicant is given 10 days to review and submit written comments and additional materials.
Can this change or is it a union or policy or AP thing where procedures need to be followed to the 'T'?
We need an audit log.
|
Review | How often do applicants appeal? Can it be a manual process if we do get appeals this year? | Won't plan for it this phase; last year had 1 but she didn't appeal |
Review | Can the communication of getting more info from applicant be done outside the system? | Yes, that's how it was with Interfolio last year so let's do the same for this go around. |
Email | Can VPCC office review with the email templates?
Any sample of what is sent to the applicant when the chancellor makes his ruling?
| Forwarded to Sandra 8/11/2017 |
Access | Should the applicant be able to see the assessment by the chancellor through the website?
How does the scenario play out when the applicant is recommended or not recommended? | No. Don't worry about this for now. |
States | Can we display where the application is vs just saying Under Review? | Yes! |