Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

Scanning

  • Could ITS scan for missing documents? I caught a couple that I accidentally moved to trash and since Google will display files in trash for up to a month applicants may not realize the file is no longer there (although it says in small print on top of the page “file in trash”). 
  • Should we only flag errors if the hyperlink is to a native google document?
    • addresses the anonymity concern but not the access concern where reviewers might not have access to the files outside the shared drive
  • Scan hits caused by contract renewal applicants re-using their appendices document with hyperlinks to files in their prior year's contract renewal shared drive
  • Reword messaging in the link scanning report
    • app will still be submitted
    • you only have to move/copy the bulleted files
    • the numbered files are already in your shared drive
    • we scanned all files on your dossier
  • Only scan files on the dossier
    • i'm biased/brainwashed  because our original concept was the the dossier tab would be the only files

    • advantages
      • scan is quicker
      • easier to understand for the applicants
      • applicants don't have to worry about the files that they don't plan to show to the reviewers
    • disadvantages
      • potentially lots of unused files in the shared drive (but it is supposed to be a workspace)
  • No labels