Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 5 Current »

Participants:

Discussion:

FT-296 - Withdrawal Status

  • Who? will perform this action?
    • coordinator and administrators
  • What?
    • 2 use cases
      • Faculty separating
        • remove it completely from the system
      •  if in flight; lock it down and stamp it with Withdrawn State
        • applicant should get their materials back so that's accomplished with the shard drive copy
        • lock it down and clone the application (in progress)
      • changing year and app type case
    • year 5, going for tenure and past the CR deadline, reapply online
      • union has argued with Bev about TP and CR looking the same
    • Should an email notification be sent?
      • recipients (to, cc)
  • When can they perform this action, ie what statuses?
    • any status except for In Progress, Final, Appeal?
      • any State other than SUBMITTED, FINAL or APPEAL
        • generally they withdraw after they get a negative recommendation so after the TPRC
  • Where?
  • Why?

FT-491 - Negative Review process

  • Should the applicant be able to view the recommendations?
  • TPRC → send email to applicant and allow review of recommendations → click push to chancellor button or provide rebuttal → chancellor or applicant reviewing
  • Review the email templates
    • when the negative recommendation email is sent to the applicant, majority will want to read the assessments so that's why we granted them access instead of them having to click a button to do so. 



  • No labels