...
- it's a third of their case load
set up a role for UHPA (FT-303)- they need to have read-only access to the eligibility, dossier and reviews tabs only
- trying to get rid of S&W versus making a recommendation
- Kris' solution is if you can't make a decision, you're not qualified to serve
...
- Manoa is using Laulima for discussion and voting
- Deena sets the polls up for the reviewers (FT-129)
- this could become an issue for reviewers that don't want to review online
- under 40 folks would be inclined but maybe not so over 40
- Chancellors can meet with the TPRC (FT-305)
- to what extent does there need to be documentation that this meeting took place
- this process needs to capture the timeline of the procedure
- all things must be done on the appropriate timeline
- need to capture President's ruling so that we have the complete timeline of events (FT-304)
- possibly adding input fields to the Recommendations page for easier reporting because you can't report on things in a gdoc or word doc (FT-305)
- "I agree with the TPRC" or "I don't agree with the TPRC and met with them on xxxx and here's my assessment"
- she doesn't have an issue with the one page rebuttal
stress to the applicant that they need to keep a copy of their dossier in order to rebut- applicant will have view only access during their rebuttal so Kris is ok with that
What is helping to Kris is give them a list of who will be participating in 2020 (FT-302)
- reason is that they start getting calls about it and so it gives UHPA a heads up
...
- for CC's, it's the same as the TnP process but without the TPRC review
Action Items
- Cameron Ahana extrapolate the jiras from this meeting