Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees

Discussion items

WCC

susan lee’s application

...

  • does TPRC only vote or do all committees vote?

recommendations

  • all members of the TPRC will need to see the reviewreview (FT-132)

"Review Complete” disappeared after Leilani uploaded the file but refreshing brought it back

  • could not replicate

feedback

  • it’s a lot cleaner 
  • they like the hyperlinks to appendices
  • WCC applicant is happy

consider opening up the google folders to the public (Cameron Ahana - analyze for next year)

  • one reviewer asked if we could allow anyone to see, no sign-in required
  • options automatically login to google as the system user or some user
  • anonymous can be maintained by creating generic TPRC accounts for the reviewers

put something generic like "under review” for the applicant (FT-133)

email address doesn’t work when inputting committee members (FT-134)

flexibility of sections is a big selling point for applicants

...

adding to "My Drive” still allowed reviewer to see the file after access was removed 

  • Susan transferred ownership of the folder but she didn't transfer ownership of the files and the files are set to be viewable by anyone with the link

Remove FAQ link (FT-135)

Feedback

  • last year's reviewer (shamilto@hawaii.edu) really likes the system, it's simpler to use than Interfolio
  • The viewer in Interfolio restricted them to viewing one file at a time so they couldn't open multiple files at once

 

 

 

...